Segway Navimow i215 LiDAR vs Segway Navimow i220 LiDAR

A straight comparison of what the manufacturers publish. Where a figure is missing for one model, the row says so rather than filling the gap.

These two are the same machine with a different battery, which makes the comparison unusually clean: navigation, cutting width, cutting height, weight class and app are identical, and the choice comes down to how much lawn you have.

This site may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through marked links. The retailer sets the final price and terms. How this works.

What each one is best at

There is no overall winner here — which mower is “best” depends on your garden. These are the categories where one model is measurably ahead on a published figure.

Best for large lawns

Segway Navimow i220 LiDAR

Rated for the largest working area at 2,000 m².

Best value per square metre

Segway Navimow i220 LiDAR

Lowest cost per square metre of rated working area, based on the prices we currently track.

Best for smaller lawns

Segway Navimow i215 LiDAR

Smallest rated working area of the two — the least mower you need for a compact garden, with the least capacity going unused.

Where they differ

  • Working area ranges from 1,500 m² to 2,000 m² — the single biggest practical difference between them.

What they have in common

  • Both connect over Wi-Fi.
  • Both support multiple mowing zones.
  • Neither needs a buried boundary wire.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted cells mark the better figure, and are only shown when every model publishes one.

Specification comparison of Segway Navimow i215 LiDAR, Segway Navimow i220 LiDAR
Specification Segway Navimow i215 LiDAR Segway Navimow i220 LiDAR
Model identity
Model year 2024 2024
Coverage
Rated lawn area 1,500 m² 2,000 m² (best of the models compared)
Maximum slope 45% (about 24°) 45% (about 24°)
Navigation
Navigation system EFLS™ Dual-fusion: solid-state LiDAR + vision; Network RTK support EFLS™ Dual-fusion: solid-state LiDAR + vision; Network RTK support
RTK satellite Yes Yes
LiDAR Yes Yes
Camera / vision Yes Yes
Boundary wire required No No
Virtual boundaries Yes Yes
Multiple zones Yes Yes
Maximum zones 20 20
Obstacle avoidance Solid-state LiDAR + VisionFence AI camera Solid-state LiDAR + VisionFence AI camera
Cutting
Cutting width 220 mm 220 mm
Minimum cutting height 20 mm 20 mm
Maximum cutting height 70 mm 70 mm
Cutting system 1 disc, 6 blades; automatic height adjustment 1 disc, 6 blades; automatic height adjustment
Power
Runtime 2 h 40 min 3 h 30 min (best of the models compared)
Charging time 2 h 10 min 2 h (best of the models compared)
Battery Li-ion, 21.6 V, 7.65 Ah (165 Wh) Li-ion, 21.6 V, 10.0 Ah (216 Wh)
Protection
Rain sensor No No
IP rating IP66 (mower and station); IP67 (power supply) IP66 (mower and station); IP67 (power supply)
Connectivity
Wi-Fi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
4G / cellular Yes Yes
App Navimow app; Alexa and Google Home integration Navimow app; Alexa and Google Home integration
Anti-theft PIN code, GPS anti-theft tracking, geofence alarm PIN code, GPS anti-theft tracking, geofence alarm
Practical
Weight 14.7 kg 15.1 kg
Dimensions 635.2 × 445 × 287.5 mm 635.2 × 445 × 287.5 mm
Warranty 3 years (mower); 2 years (battery) 3 years (mower); 2 years (battery)
Availability Out of stock Out of stock

Which one should you buy?

The hardware is otherwise the same, so this comes down to rated working area and the battery behind it. The i220 is rated for 2,000 m² against the i215's 1,500 m², runs 210 minutes per charge against 160, and recharges in 2 h against 2 h 10 min. It also costs more — the current figures for both are in the table above, and we re-check them periodically rather than continuously.

Take the i215 if your lawn is comfortably under about 1,200 m². You would be paying for capacity you never use, and the shorter run time is irrelevant when the machine finishes early anyway.

Take the i220 if your lawn is roughly 1,200 m² or more, or if it is broken up by slopes, trees and narrow passages. Rated areas assume easy ground; on an awkward plot the extra capacity and the 50 extra minutes per charge are what stop the mower falling behind the grass.

Above about 1,700 m², think hard about either. You would be running at the edge of the rating every week with no slack for a wet spring. The X-series, or two machines, is the more honest answer.

What the numbers do not tell you

Both share a 45% maximum incline inside the working area, but Segway publishes a separate 25% limit at the boundary. If your slope runs right up to a fence or a drop, that lower figure governs, and neither model gains you anything over the other.

The charging figures are close, but the i220 also works 50 minutes longer between charges, so on the same lawn it makes fewer trips back to the base station. The gap in total cycle time is wider than the charging times alone suggest.

Neither model has been physically tested by Garden Robot Atlas. Everything above comes from the manufacturer's published specifications, linked as sources on each mower's page.

Still not sure?

Tell the Mower Finder about your lawn and it will score every eligible, recently verified model in the current database against it, showing you exactly why each one does or does not fit.

Open the Mower Finder Compare different models