Segway Navimow i215 LiDAR vs Segway Navimow i220 LiDAR
A straight comparison of what the manufacturers publish. Where a figure is missing for one model, the row says so rather than filling the gap.
These two are the same machine with a different battery, which makes the comparison unusually clean: navigation, cutting width, cutting height, weight class and app are identical, and the choice comes down to how much lawn you have.
This site may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through marked links. The retailer sets the final price and terms. How this works.
i215 LiDAR
€1,399
Checked 1 Oct 2026
Check price at Segway Navimow (EU) Full specificationsi220 LiDAR
€1,599
Checked 1 Oct 2026
Check price at Segway Navimow (EU) Full specificationsWhat each one is best at
There is no overall winner here — which mower is “best” depends on your garden. These are the categories where one model is measurably ahead on a published figure.
Segway Navimow i220 LiDAR
Lowest cost per square metre of rated working area, based on the prices we currently track.
Segway Navimow i215 LiDAR
Smallest rated working area of the two — the least mower you need for a compact garden, with the least capacity going unused.
Where they differ
- Working area ranges from 1,500 m² to 2,000 m² — the single biggest practical difference between them.
What they have in common
- Both connect over Wi-Fi.
- Both support multiple mowing zones.
- Neither needs a buried boundary wire.
Specifications side by side
Highlighted cells mark the better figure, and are only shown when every model publishes one.
| Specification | Segway Navimow i215 LiDAR | Segway Navimow i220 LiDAR |
|---|---|---|
| Model identity | ||
| Model year | 2024 | 2024 |
| Coverage | ||
| Rated lawn area | 1,500 m² | 2,000 m² (best of the models compared) |
| Maximum slope | 45% (about 24°) | 45% (about 24°) |
| Navigation | ||
| Navigation system | EFLS™ Dual-fusion: solid-state LiDAR + vision; Network RTK support | EFLS™ Dual-fusion: solid-state LiDAR + vision; Network RTK support |
| RTK satellite | Yes | Yes |
| LiDAR | Yes | Yes |
| Camera / vision | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wire required | No | No |
| Virtual boundaries | Yes | Yes |
| Multiple zones | Yes | Yes |
| Maximum zones | 20 | 20 |
| Obstacle avoidance | Solid-state LiDAR + VisionFence AI camera | Solid-state LiDAR + VisionFence AI camera |
| Cutting | ||
| Cutting width | 220 mm | 220 mm |
| Minimum cutting height | 20 mm | 20 mm |
| Maximum cutting height | 70 mm | 70 mm |
| Cutting system | 1 disc, 6 blades; automatic height adjustment | 1 disc, 6 blades; automatic height adjustment |
| Power | ||
| Runtime | 2 h 40 min | 3 h 30 min (best of the models compared) |
| Charging time | 2 h 10 min | 2 h (best of the models compared) |
| Battery | Li-ion, 21.6 V, 7.65 Ah (165 Wh) | Li-ion, 21.6 V, 10.0 Ah (216 Wh) |
| Protection | ||
| Rain sensor | No | No |
| IP rating | IP66 (mower and station); IP67 (power supply) | IP66 (mower and station); IP67 (power supply) |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| 4G / cellular | Yes | Yes |
| App | Navimow app; Alexa and Google Home integration | Navimow app; Alexa and Google Home integration |
| Anti-theft | PIN code, GPS anti-theft tracking, geofence alarm | PIN code, GPS anti-theft tracking, geofence alarm |
| Practical | ||
| Weight | 14.7 kg | 15.1 kg |
| Dimensions | 635.2 × 445 × 287.5 mm | 635.2 × 445 × 287.5 mm |
| Warranty | 3 years (mower); 2 years (battery) | 3 years (mower); 2 years (battery) |
| Availability | Out of stock | Out of stock |
Which one should you buy?
The hardware is otherwise the same, so this comes down to rated working area and the battery behind it. The i220 is rated for 2,000 m² against the i215's 1,500 m², runs 210 minutes per charge against 160, and recharges in 2 h against 2 h 10 min. It also costs more — the current figures for both are in the table above, and we re-check them periodically rather than continuously.
Take the i215 if your lawn is comfortably under about 1,200 m². You would be paying for capacity you never use, and the shorter run time is irrelevant when the machine finishes early anyway.
Take the i220 if your lawn is roughly 1,200 m² or more, or if it is broken up by slopes, trees and narrow passages. Rated areas assume easy ground; on an awkward plot the extra capacity and the 50 extra minutes per charge are what stop the mower falling behind the grass.
Above about 1,700 m², think hard about either. You would be running at the edge of the rating every week with no slack for a wet spring. The X-series, or two machines, is the more honest answer.
What the numbers do not tell you
Both share a 45% maximum incline inside the working area, but Segway publishes a separate 25% limit at the boundary. If your slope runs right up to a fence or a drop, that lower figure governs, and neither model gains you anything over the other.
The charging figures are close, but the i220 also works 50 minutes longer between charges, so on the same lawn it makes fewer trips back to the base station. The gap in total cycle time is wider than the charging times alone suggest.
Neither model has been physically tested by Garden Robot Atlas. Everything above comes from the manufacturer's published specifications, linked as sources on each mower's page.
Still not sure?
Tell the Mower Finder about your lawn and it will score every eligible, recently verified model in the current database against it, showing you exactly why each one does or does not fit.